DRC
South of the
Equator, rains come in the morning. In terms of living in Africa, truly living,
I've been in a very narrow band on either side of the Equator, but on the
mirrored side from here (Mvangan), my favorite thing was the sound of rain on
the tin eaves at night, going to sleep to that. Morning rains were rarer, but
they at least delayed going to work -- and meetings would either happen on
time, happen hours late, or not happen at all. I wasn't a doctor, then. The
plan tonight was for a bonfire/ effigy burning in honor of Guy Fawkes
day--though there's one English volunteer in this post, we've decided to
celebrate everyone's holidays. The rain makes it a little more difficult today.
Rains in the morning. Rainy season
that was supposed to start a month ago, (also by the internal calendar I keep
by heart from Cameroon -- from January, dry season, small dry season, small
rainy season, rainy season). Precise dates over decades and centuries governing
planting, harvesting, and when that changes (global climate change), you don't
know when to plant, it might be too early or too late, and the crop might
either exist less, the same, or be destroyed. Nearer to here, insecurity during
the (north of the Tropic of Cancer) summer, meant that people fled their
villages, are returning slowly, and will not be able to plant this year, or
partially, or not at all, or because of the delayed rains it will be okay.
In medicine, sometimes we say things
are "evidence-free zones." Nothing to guide you, going on blind faith
and/or prior knowledge and/or hope and/or there's nothing else left.
I only see
patients here with HIV and/or tuberculosis. What I like about HIV is also the
worst thing about it. Everything (can be) is more complicated. The differential
diagnosis expands and changes. It's a different context. Because anything can
and still does (and this makes the truly general internist in me happy) happen.
That's HIV in Africa, anyway. Practicing in the US, it's often a different
story, it truly is (can be) just another chronic disease to manage, more
medications and different things to know, and (usually) requires no specialty
care. This is a different story.
With TB, it can manifest anywhere in
the body, as almost anything. And that's why I love it (syphilis is actually
very similar. And in the US, we say that of lupus). Protean. Ever changing. Slippery. And we do have tests for TB
here, more than I might have imagined (also, less). But sometimes they're all
negative and you have to decide on probabilities, test characteristics,
clinical judgment, and blind faith. And now, when they ask for the doctor's
opinion before starting TB treatmenta for someone we have not proven has TB...
that's me. That's my "clinical judgment." That's my "blind
faith." Do I even have that? Maybe, here. Evidence-free zone.
I changed posts this week. I've been
in the hospital less, so there's only been one death, thus far, under my (brief
hands) of care. He actually died an hour after my colleague and I saw him, my
colleague swiftly threaded the spinal needle into his back for perfectly clear
fluid, and we hoped for a diagnosis before starting treatment (for what I was convinced
he had), what had put him into a coma with a fever of 41 deg C/ 106 deg F for
days, and we hadn't known about him. When we went to get the results in the
morning, we learned he had died. Found the chart. An hour later. Would I still,
with negative tests, started a treatment that could potentially have killed him
in a different way, with no proof? Likely enough. Sometimes it's out of
desperation. Though how different is it with some chemotherapies? Last ditch
attempt. Maybe. Maybe a few more weeks or months or years. Here, often enough,
given when people come to the hospital, it's measured in days.
Fewer deaths, last
week. With my hands on. I don't know what this week will bring.
In this post, before starting to see
patients in the clinics we go to the field, I've attended support groups for
the HIV+ patients (translated for me, diligently and thoughtfully, by my
colleagues). They have really put an emphasis on and effort into psychosocial
programs, including group and individual sessions, which have been remarkable
to see. One woman's story involved seeing her husband murdered in front of her
when an armed group pulled everyone out of their houses (Not close to where I
am. She moved here). And many of the discussions revolved around shame.
Auto-stigmatisation, community rejection even upon the perception that you're
sick. And after recounting experiences, family not wanting to touch them, eat
with them, live with them, talk to them anymore (some people do have more
positive stories), they turned expectantly to me for more insights. How,
Doctor, can we be better deal with shame?
I have nothing to add. I have heard
some of this before, in other practices in other cities, on another continent,
in another universe. Patients removing labels from prescription bottles, hiding
them, losing them. Being rejected from their families, communities. And here, I
am, at times, very deliberate in saying that I'm an HIV doctor in the United
States as well, that I've had patients there die from AIDS, that many of the
medications are the same (...or were...), that I describe the illness in the
same way, and that some of the lessons I taught, last week, at a nursing
school, were actually just translated from presentations I did over the past
year in English. a
*post mostly
written November 5th and completed November 12th
But no one has
asked me before what to do, in my professional medical opinion, about shame.
The things people want to know in
medicine, the things that actually matter to them, are rarely things I know.
Eye twitching. Random pain or skin reactions that come and then go away. The
real mechanism of palpitations (when you feel them, and why then? It isn't
related to heart rate). And shame. The question wasn't about combating stigma,
not that day. We're asking people to give "testimonies" of their
experiences, on World AIDS Day. Several have volunteered, want to tell about
their journey from diagnosis to now, how sick they were and how much better
they look.
The nurses here know the medications
(there are few), know the labs to draw (there are few), know the common signs
and symptoms and diagnoses. They know the patients, some for years. But maybe,
just maybe, someone new, from the outside, could give the patients a different
perspective on this topic, a way to rationalize and treat and attack.
I have nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment